Part

Building Asymmetric Advantage in Indo-Pacific Part of DOD Approach to Chinese Aggression > U.S. Department of Defense > Defense Department News

[ad_1] In the Indo-Pacific region, Chinese aggression demonstrates an effort by Beijing to deconstruct core elements of the international…

2 years ago

Veterans Stories – Vince Speranza – The story behind the Airborne beer (part 1)

TÉMOIGNAGE DE VÉTÉRAN Vince Speranza était mitrailleur dans la célèbre 101e Airborne Division. Il a libéré l'Europe jusqu'en Allemagne. Dans…

2 years ago

Pure Farming 2018 – Part 1: Grampa's Farm – Let's Play Pure Farming 2018

Pure Farming 2018 gives us the chance to actually get inside the shiny farm vehicles and drive them ourselves, which…

2 years ago

Southern CC, Veterans Cooking Class 1 (part 1)

Learn how to cook a special dish from Peru https://www.southernccinc.org/recovery-solutions/ source

2 years ago

Secretary concession SMC part of every claim for increase; The Secretary further concedes that because SMC is an issue within an increased rating claim, the Board should have considered whether the appellant filed a claim for an increased disability rating for his left eye condition earlier than January 2014 or, at a minimum, considered 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2), which allows under certain circumstances an effective date up to 1 year prior to the date of a claim for increase. Secretary’s Br. at 9.; the Secretary further concedes that, to the extent that SMC may be considered part of a claim for increased compensation, see Akles v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 118, 121 (1991) (concluding that the RO “should have inferred from the veteran’s request for an increase in benefits . . . a request for [SMC] whether or not it was placed in issue by the veteran”), the Board should have addressed whether the appellant sought SMC through an increased rating claim for his left eye disability prior to January 2014 or whether 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2) applied. See Secretary’s Br. at 8-10. The Court will accept the Secretary’s concession, ;

[ad_1] ; Skip to content Posted in Uncategorized Tagged Case Law…

2 years ago

WCEG Network presents Veterans Today hosts Anthony C Aiken & Herman Anderson. part 1

WCEG Network presents Veterans Today hosts Herman Anderson & Anthony C Aiken and guest Morocco Coleman. Call in 1-678-619-1402. part…

2 years ago

WCEG Network ATL – Veterans Today hosts Herman Anderson & Anthony C. Aiken. part 2.

WCEG Network presents Veterans Today hosts Herman Anderson & Anthony C. Aiken. Call in 1-678-619-1402. part 2. source

2 years ago

Clark County Family Court Protest hosted by Veterans In Politics part 4

source

2 years ago

‘VFW is a Part of Our Culture’

[ad_1] About 15 years ago, the founder of Sport Clips Haircuts, a premiere hair care franchise, began a partnership with…

2 years ago

The examination report must include • an up-to-date, brief, medical and industrial history from the date of discharge or last examination • a record of subjective complaints • a complete description of objective findings, stated in concrete terms • a diagnosis for each described condition[] • answer(s) to any question specifically included in the examination request • opinions specifically requested in the exam request • a diagnosis or notation that a chronic disease or disability was ruled out for each disability, complaint, or symptom listed on the examination request, and • the clinical findings required by the rating schedule for the evaluation of the specific disability being claimed. (For example, if a joint is being examined, the range of motion in degrees should be noted as part of the examination. If a cardiovascular condition is being examined, the metabolic equivalent expanded before fatigue, chest pain, and so on, result should be expressed.); M21-1MR, pt. III, subpt. iv, ch. 3, sec. D(f); In response to the Court’s inquiry, counsel for the Secretary stated that this provision is intended to assist VA adjudicators in determining what constitutes a sufficient report of examination for compensation and pension purposes, but conceded that a particular VA medical record may still qualify as a “report of examination” under § 3.157(b)(1) even if it is not as detailed as required by this M21-1MR provision.;

[ad_1] Panel Application; the Veterans Benefits Administration Adjudication Procedures Manual (M21-1MR) are intended to describe the type of VA…

3 years ago
Show more Posts