hearing

Axil Hearing Protection (Hands-On Review) in 2022

[ad_1] Welcome to Clout Patrol, the semi-regular series where we put much-hyped gear to the test. If something is worth…

2 years ago

Bahns evidentiary hearing for custody Family Court Judge Rena Hughes 1-6

source

2 years ago

Single Judge Application; Hensley prohibits the Board from denying service connection for hearing loss solely because the audiometric test results did not constitute a disability under § 3.385 during service. 5 Vet.App. 155, 160 (1993); Hensley does not prohibit examiners from discussing in-service audiometric test results or relying on audiometric results that reveal normal hearing to form their opinion if they also consider other factors. Id.;

[ad_1] Single Judge Application; Hensley prohibits the Board from denying service connection for hearing loss solely because the audiometric…

2 years ago

Single Judge Application; in Hensley v. Brown 5 Vet.App. 155, 157 (1993), the Court determined that the threshold for normal hearing is from 0 to 20 decibels, and higher threshold levels reflect some degree of hearing loss. Review of the May 1974 separation examination reflects that the appellant’s right ear hearing threshold at 4000 Hertz is 25 decibels, R. at 1237, and pursuant to Hensley v. Brown, this does reveal some level of hearing loss – especially when compared to the May 1972 enlistment examination which reflects his right ear hearing threshold at 4000 Hertz to be 5 decibels, R. at 1241.;

[ad_1] Single Judge Application; in Hensley v. Brown 5 Vet.App. 155, 157 (1993), the Court determined that the threshold…

2 years ago

The Board concluded that “a denial of a hearing at the AOJ is not an appealable determination by VA.

[ad_1] In order to file a Supplemental Claim, you must add evidence that is new (or not provided to VA…

3 years ago

Single Judge Application; hearing loss effective date; Swain v. McDonald, 27 Vet.App. 219 (2015); in Swain v. McDonald the Court explained that 38 C.F.R. § 4.85 does not govern the effective date for hearing loss ratings. See 27 Vet.App. at 224-25. The Court held that the effective date for hearing loss may be earlier than the date of an audiometric test that satisfies the criteria under 38 C.F.R. § 4.85, and that, “unless otherwise specifically noted in the statute or regulation, [38 U.S.C. § 5110(b)(3)] and [38 C.F.R.] § 3.400 govern the effective date for disability benefits claims.” Id. at 225. The Board noted some of Mr. Garcia’s statements about his worsening hearing loss before 2019, but the Board denied entitlement to a compensable rating before June 11, 2019, seemingly because the record did not contain any other “audiometric testing results during this portion of the appeal period which comply with 38 C.F.R. § 4.85 for rating purposes.” R. at 11.; » HadIt.com For Veterans Who’ve Had It With The VA

[ad_1] Single Judge Application; hearing loss effective date; Swain v. McDonald, 27 Vet.App. 219 (2015); in Swain v. McDonald…

3 years ago

How A 3D-Printed Hearing Device Is Helping US Veterans

Over the past several years, Vietnam veteran Michael Nicoletti found his hearing loss gradually getting wose. After trying a homemade…

3 years ago

Northcom, Southcom Leaders Discuss Border, Hemispheric Security at Hearing > U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE > Defense Department News

[ad_1] An increase in migrants coming across the southern border, threats to the Western Hemisphere by China, and solutions…

3 years ago

Bilateral Hearing Loss | HadIt.com For Veterans Who’ve Had It With The VA

[ad_1] Hi All,Long story short: Filed a claim for an increase in October 2014 at the advice of two other…

3 years ago

Kim Blandino wins his motion in a TPO Hearing part 1-2

Kim Blandino wins his motion in a TPO Hearing part 1-2. source

3 years ago
Show more Posts