:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/mco/T56ADX64ANDYNP5MWRKCULXRZA.jpg "Navajo Code Talker Samuel Sandoval dies")
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/mco/QBYJTGYCQBHSVITAL32RAO7HAA.jpg "Veteran honored for once-secret role in WWII ‘Ghost Army’")
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/mco/YVREBMCGTNFNTI6PSBKVQDR7CU.jpg "Coast Guard veteran held without bail in ID theft mystery")
Single Judge Application; pain; functional loss; If pain causes functional loss, it “must be rated at the same level as if that functional loss were caused by some other factor.” Mitchell v. Shinseki, 25 Vet.App. 32, 37, (2011); For an examination to adequately capture functional loss, the examiner must opine whether pain could significantly limit functional ability and, if feasible, portray that opinion “‘in terms of the degree of additional range-of-motion loss due to pain on use or during flare-ups.’” Sharp, 29 Vet.App. at 32 (quoting Deluca v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 202, 206 (1995));
Designated for electronic publication onlyUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMSNo. 19-6885BILLY MOSLEY, APPELLANT,V.DENIS MCDONOUGH,SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.Before TOTH, Judge.MEMORANDUM DECISIONNote: Pursuant to U.S. Vet. App. R. 30(a),this ...