Single Judge Application/Citation; Tadlock v. McDonough, 5 F.4th (Fed.Cir. 2021);

[ad_1]

Read More Here

Tadlock v. McDonough, 5 F.4th 1327,1335 (Fed.Cir. 2021)(instructing this Court to leave matters to the Board that are “open to debate”)

Tadlock v. McDonough, 5 F.4th 1327, 1335 (Fed.Cir. 2021) (holding that this Court cannot make findings of fact in the first instance in the context of harmless error analysis)

Tadlock v. McDonough, 5 F.4th 1327,1335 (Fed.Cir. 2021)(holding that this “Court may affirm on a ground not considered by the Board and the VA if it is clear that the factual basis for such conclusion is not open to debate and the Board on remand could not have reached any other determination on that issue”(citing Mayfield v. Nicholson ,444 F.3d 1328,1336 (Fed. Cir.2006)))

Tadlock v. McDonough, 5 F.4th 1327,1336 (Fed.Cir. 2021)(holding that the Court’s statutory duty to consider prejudicial error “does not give it the right to make de novo findings of fact or otherwise resolve matters that are open to debate”)

Tadlock , 5 F.4th at 1336 (citing Mayfield v. Nicholson, 444 F.3d 1328,1336 (Fed. Cir. 2006)(“[T]his case is not one in which we can conclude that there was no violation of the Chenery doctrine on the ground that ‘it is clear that …the agency would have reached the same ultimate result under the court’s legal theory.’”(alteration in original)

Tadlock, 5 F.4th at 1337-38 (“Where additional findings of fact are necessary regarding matters open to debate,the proper action for the Veterans Court is to remand to the Board for consideration of those facts